... the site by being destroyed, and so it was inappropriate to consider whether or not the bungalow was a fixture as to regard something as a fixture it must first be attached to a building. Traditionally when looking at purpose of annexation the courts will look at whether an object was affixed with the intention of making it a permanent improvement to the land or was it attached in order to use of display the chattel. In Leigh v. Taylor.4 the case concerned the question of whether tapestries which had been fixed to the walls by attaching them to wooden frames were fixtures or chattels. It was held that they were chattels as they were attached for the purpose of ornament and which could not be removed without causing structural injury were chattels. This approach continued in Berkley v. Poulett.5 in which the question of whether pictures fitted into recesses in ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now