... contemporaries dismissed its credibility. Firstly Schliemann's crude methodical techniques are not definitive in comparison to the works of other archaeologists such as, General Pitt Rivers. Secondly Schliemann's discovery of an unknown civilization contributed to the broadening of ancient history. Moreover, Schliemann's ability to see the great value of oral history and mythology has brought significant development to historical methodologies. Finally Schliemann's flawed yet revealing archaeological techniques has allowed archaeology to improve, in learning from its mistakes. Firstly Schliemann's contribution to the development of ancient history is limited in comparison to that of archaeological pioneers such as Pitt Rivers. Rivers, like Schliemann both avoided the stigma as 'treasure hunters' in their pursuit for knowledge of the antiquities. However Schliemann's failure to seek perfection and accuracy questions his place in true archaeological circles. Historian Geoffrey Arnott comments, 'the accuracy of his excavation reports can...be questioned, most seriously with regard to Troy.' ...

See this essay or coursework document in full right now