-
What offences has Basil (who is educationally subnormal) committed in the following circumstances?
... the head, knocking Derek unconscious. Thinking that he has
killed Derek, Basil takes two large plastic refuse sacks and
secures these around Derek's body. Derek dies of asphyxiation.
Firstly, if Basil is under the age of 10, he may not be ...
-
"The law relating to the mens rea of murder in England and Wales has now become settled through a series of judicial decisions, which together, have made it unnecessary for Parliament to legislate on the matter" - Critically consider.
... which can be one of two things; intention to kill or intention to cause serious bodily harm (SBH).
The test of what the defendant foresaw and intended is always a subjective one and is based on what the jury believes he ...
-
"The Nedrick/Woolin direction on intention manages to produce a clear distinction between intention and recklessness - Explain and discuss.
... jury. The trial judge told the jury that a 'substantial risk' as to the consequences was only required to infer intention, but the House of Lords declared that the consequences have to be (a) virtually certain and (b) known to ...
-
'Critically Evaluate the Meaning of the term Recklessness to Describe an Aspect of Mens Rea and explain how it is currently applied to offences in English Law'.
... lead to an injustice as some people who are mentally sub-normal (but not insane) may not be aware that what they are doing will involve further risks, and because of this it would seem harsh to compare them to a ...
-
'The current law of intoxication is indefensible as theory and producesindefensible results - We should abolish it completely and rely on the jury to determine what the accused's mental state was at the time of the actus reus.'
... one of basic intent or one of specific intent, and whether his intoxication was voluntary or involuntary.
Intoxication has gradually developed as a defence as the law has become more interested in the mental element of crime. The defence of intoxication ...
-
Advise Clive who has been charged with the murder of David.
... is given emergency treatment.
After a few days David is still in a critical condition and then develops a secondary infection -for which he is given an antibiotic drug. Unfortunately David is highly allergic to the drug and dies the following ...
-
Advise the parties of their criminal liability. What difference, if any would make the answer if J had died.
... issues. Firstly, the piercing of the ear itself and for the passing of infection (blood poisoning). As regards to the piercing clearly this would involve a breaking of the skin JJC v Eisenhover and therefore can be classified as a ...
-
Any crime in law is made up of two elements, the actus reus which is defined as the 'guilty act' and the mens rea defined as the 'guilty mind'.
... the crime. In R v. Nedrick (1986) the jury had to decide whether the result of the defendant's actions was a virtual certainty. R v. Cunningham (1957) shows an example of subjective recklessness whereby the defendant was aware of the ...
-
As law assignment 2.2
... Court requires precedent to make his judgement, he or she will use previous decisions from the ECJ, the House of Lords, the Court of Appeal, or another High Court. He or she will not use previous decisions from Magistrates Court, ...
-
As there is a substantial injury in the form of a dislocated knee, Adrian immediately goes beyond the realms of assault, as force was applied, and battery – as there was an injury. A section 47
... calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim" (Miller (1954)); which I believe Adrian goes beyond. Adrian may be criminally liable according to section 20 of the Offence Against the Person Act 1861, which is triable either-way ...
-
Assault and intoxication - Discuss the possible criminal liability of Andy and Bert.
... She moves to one side and the glass strikes Ellen, who is in the next seat, causing her severe lacerations to the ear.
Andy may be liable for causing grievous bodily harm with intent contrary to s.18 OAPA 1861, maliciously inflicting ...
-
Barristers and Solicitors
... an individual solicitor may specialise in some particular aspect of law, and some firms specialise as a whole. In particular, there are a number of large firms (mainly in London) who deal only with corporate clients, providing advice, assistance and ...
-
Briefly Explain The Meaning Of These Terms: Actus Reus And Mens Rea
... the "thin skull rule". In another case a Jehovah Witness refused a blood transfusion after being stabbed, she later died, the person who stabbed her was still convicted with manslaughter because his actions led to her death and she would ...
-
Consider Dennis' liability for the deaths of Sarah and Mary.
... reasonable person would inevitably recognise that it carried some risk of harm, that the act was a substantial cause of death, and the accused intended to commit the act as distinct from intending its consequence. The prosecution must prove that ...
-
Consider the possible criminal liability arising in the above circumstances.
... pulls Steve to the floor saying, "I have warned you about this", causing Steve to be severely bruised.
Consider the possible criminal liability arising in the above circumstances.
The defendants may be liable for causing grievous bodily harm with intent contrary ...
-
Consider what offences, if any, have been committed - Murder.
... death. As Topov's death occurred as a result of Hartley pushing over Topov, but for Hartley's actions, Topov would not have been admitted to hospital where his death occurred under treatment.
Legal causation-Hartley's act 'need not be the sole cause ...
-
Criminal Assignment.
... 1861 for Actual Bodily Harm and Battery. Dick has demonstrated an unlawful display of force against Jasmin which caused her to apprehend immediate and unlawful violence (the requirement for actual bodily harm) with the consequence of a broken nose. In ...
-
CRIMINAL LAW
... in swerving to avoid Tom, ran into a queue of people at a bus stop and killed Walter.
When stopped and questioned, Tom was though to be drunk but he maintained that he had no recollection of anything that had occurred ...
-
Criminal Law - reference case.
... is similar, however the second element of it refers to pecuniary advantages rather than services, which include borrowing by way of overdraft, taking out an insurance policy, and receiving the opportunity of remuneration in employment. Obtaining a pecuniary advantage by ...
-
Criminal Liability - Thabo Meli and Others v Reginam 1954.
... to the general principle [that mistake as to the element of actus reus negatives mens rea] and to hold that although the accused thinks he is dealing with a corpse, still his act is murder if his mistaken belief that ...
-
Criminal liability is generally based on fault with the prosecution having to prove both actus reus and mens rea. Some criminal offences are crimes of strict liability. Briefly explain the meaning of these 3 terms.
... (1993) and Winzar v Chief constable
of Kent (1983) are 2 examples of this.
The actus reus must be voluntary, it must have been carried out by
some one who has control over his actions. However if they do not ...
-
critical evalution of murder
... It fails to cover recklessness so, for example, a terrorist who gives a warning that he has planted a bomb but people are still killed as a result of it being detonated, cannot be convicted of murder because he doesn't ...
-
Critically assess the current law regarding the Mens Rea of murder
... many problems, with the courts attempting to define this type of intention many times throughout key cases.
First, in Moloney 1985 (where the defendant shot and killed his stepfather in a drunken challenge to see who was quicker on the ...
-
Critically evaluate the meaning of the term
... states of mind which separately or together can constitute the necessary Mens Rea of a criminal offence.
When discussing Mens Rea, we often refer to the difference between subjective (Cunningham) and objective (Caldwell) tests. Put simply, a subjective test involves ...
-
Critically evaluate the principles governing the law on Intoxication.
... the ability to judge between right and wrong or that he
did something whilst being drunk which he would not ever do had he been sober.
There are two categories of intoxication, the first of which is voluntary intoxication, this is ...