Gain Immediate access to our Essays
FREE access exchanged for your work, or pay £4.99
Words: 550 | Submitted: Thu Mar 20 2008
... mumps, rubella and TB, diseases that may inevitably save the lives of many humans. From this, it can be argued that without animal testing remarkable life changing developments would not have been possible and medicine may not be where it is today it terms of treatment. Someone in support of animal testing may further argue that if you try to prevent animals from been tested, should you stop people eating meat? It can be argued that killing an animal for food is no different that killing an animal whilst testing a new product or medicine. Humans it can be said eat animals for pleasure, as they enjoy the taste of that particular meat, whereas the testing of products on animals is not for pleasure, its to further someone's life or develop a pharmatrecual product. From this, animal testing may be argued to be justified as humans appear more than willing ...
FREE access exchanged for your work, or pay £4.99